Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 051f633 and 8e76cce.

• app/(editor)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/_client.tsx (1 hunks)
• app/(editor)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/navigation.tsx (2 hunks)
• components/ArticleMenu/ArticleMenu.tsx (2 hunks)
• components/ArticlePreview/ArticlePreview.tsx (2 hunks)
• components/Focusable/Focusable.tsx (1 hunks)
• components/Footer/Footer.tsx (2 hunks)
• components/Nav/Nav.tsx (4 hunks)
• components/Theme/ThemeToggle/ThemeToggle.tsx (2 hunks)
• components/ui/Search.tsx (2 hunks)
• styles/globals.css (2 hunks)
• tailwind.config.js (1 hunks)

components/Focusable/Focusable.tsx (3)

15-15: LGTM!

The export statement is appropriate for a single-component file.

---

1-6: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using a more flexible type for children

The ReactElement type might be too restrictive as it doesn't allow function components. Consider using ReactElement | JSX.Element for better compatibility.

 interface FocusableProps {
-  children: ReactElement;
+  children: ReactElement | JSX.Element;
   rounded?: boolean;
 }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

---

8-13: Verify focus ring visibility across themes

The current focus ring implementation might not provide sufficient contrast in all theme variations.

Let's check for other focus ring implementations in the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different search strategy to verify the focus ring implementation.

This should help us find focus-related styling patterns across the codebase, including both TypeScript/TSX files and any CSS/Tailwind configuration files.

---

Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response regarding the focus ring visibility concern:

Focus ring implementation follows consistent patterns with sufficient contrast

The codebase shows a well-thought-out focus ring implementation:

• The Focusable component uses a consistent pattern with:
  • White base ring (focus:ring-white)
  • Pink accent ring on focus-visible (focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-pink-600)
  • Pink offset for depth (focus-visible:ring-offset-pink-600)
• This pattern is consistently used across the application, as seen in global styles and other components
• The implementation includes:
  • Light theme: Pink rings (#E11D48) against white/light backgrounds
  • Dark theme: White base rings against dark backgrounds
  • Proper ring widths (2px) and offsets for visual depth
• The color combinations (pink/white against light/dark backgrounds) provide sufficient contrast ratios for accessibility

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for focus ring related classes
rg "focus.*ring" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 67

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for focus ring related classes with ripgrep, including all text files
rg "focus.*ring"

# Also search for any focus-related styles to get a broader context
rg "focus[:-]" 

Length of output: 32770

tailwind.config.js (1)

11-12: Review brand color choices.

The defined colors appear to deviate from the official brand colors:

• twitter: "#282828" is a dark gray, while Twitter's brand color is typically #1DA1F2
• github: "#f17f06" is orange, while GitHub's brand color is typically #24292e

Let's check if these colors are used consistently across the codebase:

components/Theme/ThemeToggle/ThemeToggle.tsx (2)

3-3: LGTM: Import statement follows conventions

The Focusable component import aligns with the PR's objective to centralize focus management.

---

30-42: Verify focus style interactions

While the Focusable wrapper implementation looks correct, there are a few points to verify:

1. The button's existing focus:ring-inset class might conflict with styles applied by the Focusable component
2. The group-focus classes might interact differently when wrapped with Focusable

Let's verify the Focusable implementation:

Could you confirm if the Focusable component is designed to work with or replace these existing focus styles?

✅ Verification successful

Let me try different commands to gather the necessary information.

---

Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a definitive response about the focus style interactions.

No focus style conflicts with Focusable component

The implementation shows that there are no conflicts between the button's focus:ring-inset and Focusable component's styles because:

1. The Focusable component uses different focus-related classes:

   • focus:outline-none
   • focus:ring-white
   • focus-visible:ring-2
   • focus-visible:ring-pink-600
   • focus-visible:ring-offset-pink-600

2. The group-focus classes in ThemeToggle will work as expected since Focusable preserves the original className and only appends its own focus-related styles through cloneElement.

The component is properly designed to work alongside existing focus and group-focus styles, enhancing rather than conflicting with them.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Focusable implementation for potential style conflicts
echo "Checking Focusable component implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export default function Focusable' -A 20

# Check for other instances of focus:ring-inset usage
echo "Checking other instances of focus:ring-inset..."
rg "focus:ring-inset" --type tsx --type jsx

# Check for other group-focus usage with Focusable
echo "Checking group-focus usage with Focusable..."
rg "group-focus.*?Focusable|Focusable.*?group-focus" --type tsx --type jsx

Length of output: 546

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Focusable component implementation
echo "Searching for Focusable component file..."
fd Focusable

# Once we find the file, let's look at its content
echo -e "\nChecking Focusable implementation..."
fd Focusable --exec cat {}

# Check for focus:ring-inset usage
echo -e "\nChecking focus:ring-inset usage..."
rg "focus:ring-inset"

# Check for group-focus usage with Focusable
echo -e "\nChecking group-focus patterns near Focusable..."
rg -B2 -A2 "Focusable"

Length of output: 12096

components/Footer/Footer.tsx (1)

23-41: LGTM! Good improvements to social media link styling.

The changes effectively move styles from globals.css into component-specific implementations, and the naming consistency improvement for YouTube is appreciated.

app/(editor)/create/[[...paramsArr]]/navigation.tsx (2)

12-12: LGTM: Import statement aligns with PR objectives.

The Focusable component import is correctly added, supporting the transition away from global CSS styles.

---

87-98: Verify consistent usage of Focusable across navigation components.

Let's ensure similar navigation components follow the same pattern.

✅ Verification successful

Let me analyze the results and generate one more verification script to get complete context.

The first command will help us verify if other rounded navigation elements follow similar patterns. The second command will help identify if there are other notification indicators that should maintain consistency with the current implementation.

---

Let me correct the file type in the search commands.

The commands are now corrected to search across all files. This will help us verify the consistency of rounded elements and notification indicators throughout the codebase.

---

Based on the comprehensive search results, I can now provide a final response:

Focusable component is consistently used for interactive elements in navigation

The implementation is consistent with the codebase patterns:

• The Focusable component is appropriately used across similar navigation components, as seen in Nav.tsx, Search.tsx, and ThemeToggle.tsx
• The notification indicator styling (rounded-full with absolute positioning) matches other notification indicators in the codebase, particularly in Nav.tsx which uses the same pattern
• The hover and focus states follow the established pattern used across navigation elements

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of Focusable in navigation components
# and potential missing focus styles

# Look for other navigation components that might need Focusable
echo "Searching for navigation components:"
fd --type f "nav|navigation" --exec rg -l "Menu.Button|Link.*className.*rounded"

# Check for existing Focusable usage
echo -e "\nChecking Focusable usage in these components:"
rg "import.*Focusable|<Focusable"

Length of output: 1766

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation of similar navigation elements with rounded styles
# to ensure consistent patterns

# Check implementation of rounded links/buttons in navigation components
echo "Checking rounded link/button implementations:"
rg -A 3 -B 3 'className="[^"]*rounded[^"]*"' --type tsx

# Check if there are any other notification-like elements that might need similar treatment
echo -e "\nChecking notification-like implementations:"
rg -A 2 'absolute.*(?:top|right).*rounded.*bg-' --type tsx

Length of output: 378

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation of similar navigation elements with rounded styles
# to ensure consistent patterns

# Check implementation of rounded links/buttons in navigation components
echo "Checking rounded link/button implementations:"
rg -A 3 -B 3 'className="[^"]*rounded[^"]*"'

# Check if there are any other notification-like elements that might need similar treatment
echo -e "\nChecking notification-like implementations:"
rg -A 2 'absolute.*(?:top|right).*rounded.*bg-'

Length of output: 83808

styles/globals.css (1)

Line range hint 1-341: Verify removal of social media classes.

The AI summary mentions removal of social media-related classes (.twitter, .github, .discord, .youtube), but I don't see these classes in the current file. Let's verify if they were properly removed and if there are any remaining references.

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining social media class references
rg -i "class.*(?:twitter|github|discord|youtube)" --type-add 'web:*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}'

# Search for any remaining social media-related styles
rg -i "\.(?:twitter|github|discord|youtube)\s*{" --type css

components/ArticleMenu/ArticleMenu.tsx (2)

22-22: LGTM: Clean import of Focusable component

The import statement follows project conventions and correctly references the new Focusable HOC.

---

152-173: Verify consistent usage of rounded prop across Focusable implementations

The implementation looks good and maintains all existing functionality. However, let's ensure consistent usage of the rounded prop across other components.

Note: Consider documenting the interaction between the button's hover styles (hover:bg-neutral-300 dark:hover:bg-neutral-800) and Focusable's focus styles to prevent potential style conflicts in the future.

✅ Verification successful

Let me try a different approach to verify the Focusable component usage.

---

The rounded prop is used consistently in bookmark-related components only

Based on the search results, the rounded prop is only used in bookmark-related components (ArticleMenu and ArticlePreview), where it makes sense due to the circular button design. Other Focusable implementations correctly omit this prop as they wrap non-circular elements. The implementation is consistent with the component's design pattern:

• rounded={true} is used for:
  • Bookmark buttons in ArticleMenu and ArticlePreview
• rounded prop is omitted for:
  • Navigation links
  • Theme toggle
  • Search button
  • Footer links
  • Social links

The current implementation maintains proper prop usage patterns across the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other Focusable implementations to verify rounded prop usage
ast-grep --pattern 'Focusable rounded={$_}'

Length of output: 45

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find all files that might contain Focusable component usage
rg -l "Focusable" 

# Then let's see the actual implementations with context
rg "<Focusable" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 4452

components/ArticlePreview/ArticlePreview.tsx (1)

22-22: LGTM: Clean import of Focusable component.

The import aligns with the PR objectives of introducing the Focusable HOC.

components/Nav/Nav.tsx (5)

23-23: LGTM: Clean import statement added.

The Focusable component import follows proper conventions.

---

210-221: LGTM: Consistent mobile implementation.

The mobile notification link correctly mirrors the desktop implementation while maintaining mobile-specific positioning adjustments.

---

224-229: Consider consolidating nav-button usage.

While the implementation looks good, there's an opportunity to review the nav-button class usage across the component.

#!/bin/bash
# Check nav-button usage consistency
rg "nav-button" components/Nav/

Consider creating a shared NavButton component that combines Focusable and nav-button styling if this class is used frequently across navigation elements.

---

87-87: Review focus handling for all interactive elements.

While adding Focusable to notification and menu elements, consider reviewing other interactive elements in the navigation (e.g., nav-button elements, primary-button elements) for consistent focus handling.

#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential interactive elements that might need Focusable
rg -B 1 -A 1 'className="(nav-button|primary-button)"' components/Nav/

Also applies to: 141-142

---

139-150: Verify focus styles for desktop notification link.

The implementation looks good, maintaining accessibility with screen reader text and notification indicator while adopting the new Focusable pattern.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information to verify the focus styles specifically for the notification link component.

---

Let me check the Focusable component implementation to understand how it handles focus styles.

---

Focus styles for desktop notification link are properly implemented

The notification link is correctly wrapped with the Focusable component, which adds appropriate focus styles:

• Removes default outline
• Adds a white focus ring
• Applies a pink ring with offset on focus-visible
• Maintains rounded corners consistent with the design

The implementation properly replaces any previous focus-style classes with the new standardized Focusable component approach.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify no lingering focus-style classes for notification links
rg "focus-style.*notification" 

Length of output: 867

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any focus-related classes or styles in Nav.tsx
rg -B 2 -A 2 'focus|Focus' components/Nav/Nav.tsx

# Also check for any Focusable component definition
ast-grep --pattern 'const Focusable = $_'

Length of output: 2594

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of Focusable component
cat components/Focusable/Focusable.tsx

# Also look for any focus-related styles in the component's directory
rg -B 2 -A 2 'focus' components/Focusable/

Length of output: 1013

components/ui/Search.tsx (2)

32-32: LGTM: Clean import of Focusable component

The import statement follows standard conventions and aligns with the PR's objective of replacing focus-style classes.

---

544-553: LGTM: Well-implemented accessibility enhancement

The Focusable HOC is appropriately used to wrap the search button. Good accessibility practices are followed with:

• Semantic button element
• Proper aria-label
• Clear hover states for both light and dark modes